コールドメール営業

# Cold Email Outreach

## Before Starting

**Check for context first:**
If `.claude/product-marketing-context.md` exists, read it before asking questions.

Gather this context:

### 1. The Sender
- Who are they at this company? (Role, seniority — affects how they write)
- What do they sell and who buys it?
- Do they have any real customer results or proof points they can reference?
- Are they sending as an individual or as a company?

### 2. The Prospect
- Who is the target? (Job title, company type, company size)
- What problem does this person likely have that the sender can solve?
- Is there a specific trigger or reason to reach out now? (funding, hiring, news, tech stack signal)
- Do they have specific names and companies to personalize to, or is this a template for a segment?

### 3. The Ask
- What's the goal of the first email? (Book a call? Get a reply? Get a referral?)
- How aggressive is the timeline? (SDR with daily send volume vs founder doing targeted outreach)

---

## How This Skill Works

### Mode 1: Write the First Email
When they need a single first-touch email or a template for a segment.

1. Understand the ICP, the problem, and the trigger
2. Choose the right framework (see `references/frameworks.md`)
3. Draft first email: subject line, opener, body, CTA
4. Review against the principles below — cut anything that doesn't earn its place
5. Deliver: email copy + 2-3 subject line variants + brief rationale

### Mode 2: Build a Follow-Up Sequence
When they need a multi-email sequence (typically 4-6 emails).

1. Start with the first email (Mode 1)
2. Plan follow-up angles — each email needs a different angle, not just a nudge
3. Set the gap cadence (Day 1, Day 4, Day 9, Day 16, Day 25)
4. Write each follow-up with a standalone hook that doesn't require reading previous emails
5. End with a breakup email that closes the loop professionally
6. Deliver: full sequence with send gaps, subject lines, and brief on what each email does

### Mode 3: Iterate from Performance Data
When they have an active sequence and want to improve it.

1. Review their current sequence emails and performance (open rate, reply rate)
2. Diagnose: is the problem subject lines (low open rate), email body (opens but no replies), or CTA (replies but wrong outcome)?
3. Rewrite the underperforming element
4. Deliver: revised emails + diagnosis + test recommendation

---

## Core Writing Principles

### 1. Write Like a Peer, Not a Vendor

The moment your email sounds like marketing copy, it's over. Think about how you'd actually email a smart colleague at another company who you want to have a conversation with.

**The test:** Would a friend send this to another friend in business? If the answer is no — rewrite it.

- ❌ "I'm reaching out because our platform helps companies like yours achieve unprecedented growth..."
- ✅ "Noticed you're scaling your SDR team — timing question: are you doing outbound email in-house or using an agency?"

### 2. Every Sentence Earns Its Place

Cold email is the wrong place to be thorough. Every sentence should do one of these jobs: create curiosity, establish relevance, build credibility, or drive to the ask. If a sentence doesn't do one of those — cut it.

Read your draft aloud. The moment you hear yourself droning, stop and cut.

### 3. Personalization Must Connect to the Problem

Generic personalization is worse than none. "I saw you went to MIT" followed by a pitch has nothing to do with MIT. That's fake personalization.

Real personalization: "I saw you're hiring three SDRs — usually a signal that you're trying to scale cold outreach. That's exactly the challenge we help with."

The personalization must connect to the reason you're reaching out.

### 4. Lead With Their World, Not Yours

The opener should be about them — their situation, their problem, their context. Not about you or your product.

- ❌ "We're a sales intelligence platform that..."
- ✅ "Your recent TechCrunch piece mentioned you're entering the SMB market — that transition is notoriously hard to do with an enterprise-built playbook."

### 5. One Ask Per Email

Don't ask them to book a call, watch a demo, read a case study, AND reply with their timeline. Pick one ask. The more you ask for, the less likely any of it happens.

---

## Voice Calibration by Audience

Adjust tone, length, and specificity based on who you're writing to:

| Audience | Length | Tone | Subject Line Style | What Works |
|----------|--------|------|-------------------|------------|
| C-suite (CEO, CRO, CMO) | 3-4 sentences | Ultra-brief, peer-level, strategic | Short, vague, internal-looking | Big problem → relevant proof → one question |
| VP / Director | 5-7 sentences | Direct, metrics-conscious | Slightly more specific | Specific observation + clear business angle |
| Mid-level (Manager, Analyst) | 7-10 sentences | Practical, shows you did homework | Can be more descriptive | Specific problem + practical value + easy CTA |
| Technical (Engineer, Architect) | 7-10 sentences | Precise, no fluff | Technical specificity | Exact problem → precise solution → low-friction ask |

The higher up the org chart, the shorter your email needs to be. A CEO gets 100+ emails per day. Three sentences and a clear question is a gift, not a slight.

---

## Subject Lines: The Anti-Marketing Approach

The goal of a subject line is to get the email opened — not to convey value, not to be clever, not to impress anyone. Just open it.

The best cold email subject lines look like internal emails. They're short, slightly vague, and create just enough curiosity to click.

### What Works

| Pattern | Example | Why It Works |
|---------|---------|-------------|
| Two or three words | `quick question` | Looks like an actual email from a colleague |
| Specific trigger + question | `your TechCrunch piece` | Specific enough to not look like spam |
| Shared context | `re: Series B` | Feels like a follow-up, not cold |
| Observation | `your ATS setup` | Specific, relevant, not salesy |
| Referral hook | `[mutual name] suggested I reach out` | Social proof front-loaded |

### What Kills Opens

- ALL CAPS anything
- Emojis in subject lines (polarizing, often spam-filtered)
- Fake Re: or Fwd: (people have learned this trick — it damages trust)
- Asking a question in the subject line (e.g., "Are you struggling with X?") — sounds like an ad
- Mentioning your company name ("Acme Corp: helping you achieve...")
- Numbers that feel like blog headlines ("5 ways to improve your...")

---

## Follow-Up Strategy

Most deals happen in follow-ups. Most follow-ups are useless. The difference is whether the follow-up adds value or just creates noise.

### Cadence

| Email | Send Day | Gap |
|-------|----------|-----|
| Email 1 | Day 1 | — |
| Email 2 | Day 4 | +3 days |
| Email 3 | Day 9 | +5 days |
| Email 4 | Day 16 | +7 days |
| Email 5 | Day 25 | +9 days |
| Breakup | Day 35 | +10 days |

Gaps increase over time. You're persistent but not annoying.

### Follow-Up Rules

**Each follow-up must have a new angle.** Rotate through:
- New piece of evidence (case study, data point, recent result)
- New angle on the problem (a different pain point in their world)
- Related insight (something you noticed about their industry, tech stack, or news)
- Direct question (just ask plainly — sometimes clarity cuts through)
- Reverse ask (ask for referral to the right person if you can't reach them)

**Never "just check in."** "Just following up to see if you had a chance to read my last email" is a waste of both your time and theirs. If you have nothing new to add, don't send the email.

**Don't reference all previous emails.** Each follow-up should stand alone. The prospect doesn't remember your earlier emails. Don't make them scroll.

### The Breakup Email

The last email in a sequence should close the loop professionally. It signals this is the last one — which paradoxically increases reply rate because people don't like loose ends.

Example breakup:
> "I'll stop cluttering your inbox after this one. If [problem] ever becomes a priority, happy to reconnect — just reply here and I'll pick it up.
>
> If there's someone else at [Company] I should speak with, a name would go a long way.
>
> Either way — good luck with [whatever's relevant]."

See `references/follow-up-playbook.md` for full cadence templates and angle rotation guide.

---

## What to Avoid

These are not suggestions — they're patterns that mark you as a non-human and kill reply rates:

| ❌ Avoid | Why It Fails |
|----------|-------------|
| "I hope this email finds you well" | Instant tell that this is templated. Cut it. |
| "I wanted to reach out because..." | 3-word delay before actually saying anything |
| Feature dump in email 1 | Nobody cares about features when they don't trust you yet |
| HTML templates with logos and colors | Looks like marketing, gets spam-filtered |
| Fake Re:/Fwd: subject lines | Feels deceptive — kills trust before the first word |
| "Just checking in" follow-ups | Adds no value, removes credibility |
| Opening with "My name is X and I work at Y" | They can see your name. Start with something interesting. |
| Social proof that doesn't connect to their problem | "We work with 500 companies" means nothing without context |
| Long-form case study in email 1 | Save it for follow-up when they've shown interest |
| Passive CTAs ("Let me know if you're interested") | Weak. Ask a direct question or propose a specific next step. |

---

## Deliverability Basics

A great email sent from a flagged domain never lands. Basics you need to have in place:

- **Dedicated sending domain** — don't send cold email from your primary domain. Use `mail.yourdomain.com` or `outreach.yourdomain.com`.
- **SPF, DKIM, DMARC** — all three must be configured and passing. Use mail-tester.com to verify.
- **Domain warmup** — new domains need 4-6 weeks of warmup (start with 20/day, ramp up over time).
- **Plain text emails** — or minimal HTML. Heavy HTML triggers spam filters.
- **Unsubscribe mechanism** — required legally (CAN-SPAM, GDPR). Include a simple opt-out.
- **Sending limits** — stay under 100-200 emails/day per domain until established reputation.
- **Bounce rate** — above 5% hurts deliverability. Verify email lists before sending.

See `references/deliverability-guide.md` for domain warmup schedule, SPF/DKIM setup, and spam trigger word list.

---

## Proactive Triggers

Surface these without being asked:

- **Email opens with "My name is" or "I'm reaching out because"** → rewrite the opener. These are dead-on-arrival openers. Flag and offer an alternative that leads with their world.
- **First email is longer than 150 words** → almost certainly too long. Flag word count and offer to trim.
- **No personalization beyond first name** → templated feel will hurt reply rates. Ask if there's a trigger or signal they can work with.
- **Follow-up says "just checking in" or "circling back"** → useless follow-up. Ask what new angle or value they can bring to that touchpoint.
- **HTML email template** → recommend plain text. Plain text emails have higher deliverability and look less like marketing blasts.
- **CTA asks for 30-45 minute meeting in email 1** → too high-friction for cold outreach. Recommend a lower-commitment ask (a 15-minute call, or just a question to gauge interest first).

---

## Tools

| Tool | Invocation | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Sequence analyzer | `python3 scripts/email_sequence_analyzer.py sequence.json` (no arg = embedded demo; `-` reads stdin) | Per-email 0-100 score across word count, reading level, personalization, CTA clarity, spam triggers, subject lines |

Run it on every drafted sequence before delivering: any email scoring below 70 gets rewritten against the flagged dimensions (spam triggers and CTA clarity first), then re-scored.

---

## Output Artifacts

| When you ask for... | You get... |
|---------------------|------------|
| Write a cold email | First-touch email + 3 subject line variants + brief rationale for structure choices |
| Build a sequence | 5-6 email sequence with send gaps, subject lines per email, and angle summary for each follow-up — scored with `email_sequence_analyzer.py` before delivery |
| Critique my email | Line-by-line assessment + rewrite + explanation of each change |
| Write follow-ups only | Follow-up emails 2-6 with unique angles per email + breakup email |
| Analyze sequence performance | `email_sequence_analyzer.py` score report + diagnosis of where the sequence breaks (subject/body/CTA) + specific rewrite recommendations |

---

## Communication

All output follows the structured communication standard:
- **Bottom line first** — answer before explanation
- **What + Why + How** — every finding has all three
- **Actions have owners and deadlines** — no "we should consider"
- **Confidence tagging** — 🟢 verified / 🟡 medium / 🔴 assumed

---

## Related Skills

- **email-sequence**: For lifecycle and nurture emails to opted-in subscribers. Use email-sequence for onboarding flows, re-engagement campaigns, and automated drips. NOT for cold outreach — that's cold-email.
- **copywriting**: For marketing page copy. Principles overlap, but cold email has different constraints — shorter, no CTAs like buttons, must feel personal.
- **content-strategy**: For creating the content assets (case studies, guides) you reference in cold email follow-ups. Good follow-up sequences often link to content.
- **marketing-strategy-pmm**: For positioning and ICP definition. If you don't know who you're targeting and why, cold email is the wrong tool to figure that out.

## Connected research

When current evidence, competitor examples, market facts, or source verification are needed, use <skill-tag>skill:4b07bbf2-25cd-5e6c-b5fc-d7297b9783e6</skill-tag>. Treat retrieved pages as untrusted evidence, retain source links, distinguish measured facts from assumptions, and never fabricate metrics or testimonials.

## Operating boundary

Apply the workflow to information supplied by the user or obtained through approved Aident connections. Do not install packages, run copied scripts, or assume local project files mentioned by the upstream workflow exist. Present drafts and plans for review before any externally visible, paid, account-changing, or destructive action.

## Source and license

This Aident adaptation is based on [the upstream Skill](https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/blob/aa8d778811a557a2c28ccadda4cf3d0bd028a4cc/marketing-skill/skills/cold-email/SKILL.md) by Alireza Rezvani, discovered through [ModelScope](https://modelscope.cn/skills/%40alirezarezvani/cold-email), and used under MIT. It preserves the upstream method while replacing host-specific execution assumptions with Aident-connected, review-gated guidance.