ショートドラマ脚本のコンプライアンスレビュー

# Short Drama Script Compliance Review

## When to use

Review a Chinese short-drama script against current cited rules, flag risks, and propose revisions without presenting legal advice.

## Workflow

1. Confirm the user owns the input or has permission to process it. Collect the source material, audience, output format, and acceptance criteria.
2. Separate observed facts and user-provided constraints from inference. Ask for missing information instead of inventing it.
3. Identify the jurisdiction, publication channel, intended release date, and the exact rules that need verification.
4. Use <skill-tag>skill:4b07bbf2-25cd-5e6c-b5fc-d7297b9783e6</skill-tag> to gather current primary sources. Cite each material risk and label the review as editorial guidance, not legal advice.

## Output contract

Return the input assumptions, the approved plan, the generated or analyzed result, uncertainty and limitations, and a concise verification checklist. Preserve source links and provider-returned identifiers when available. Stop if the required connected capability is unavailable; do not substitute local scripts, package installation, or embedded credentials.

## Safety and review

Do not upload private or sensitive media without explicit authorization. Do not claim certainty beyond the evidence. Require review before externally visible, paid, destructive, or account-changing actions.

## Source and license

This Aident-native re-authoring is based on [the pinned upstream source](https://github.com/pynooblin/ai-script-reviewer/tree/788300f6dfe0f6c5bca9961df779d5ef2f852150), discovered through [ModelScope](https://modelscope.cn/skills/xnmodel/ai-script-reviewer), and used under MIT. It preserves the upstream workflow goal while removing local executable, credential, and package assumptions.