Turn an AI-generated report into a claim ledger, retrieve independent evidence, and record a reviewable verdict for each material claim.
Before using an AI report to choose a vendor or plan a project.
A source-backed research audit that separates supported, contradicted, and unverifiable claims.
A plausible citation can still point to the wrong author, date, or conclusion. Opening independent sources makes the result reviewable before it informs a decision.
Run the Aident Loadout use case “Fact-check AI research with current sources” (use-case:fact-check-ai-research) from https://loadout.aident.ai/use-cases/fact-check-ai-research. Use the Aident Skill to load this use case, then call its real Loadout capabilities: exa tools, exa search. Ask before any write or paid action. Given a market report with 12 claims, retrieve current primary sources for the five material claims and return a verdict plus supporting URLs for each one.
Search results are leads, not proof. Open the cited pages and retain unresolved claims when the underlying source cannot be checked. This is not a professional audit.
No dedicated Skill is linked to this guide yet. You can follow the steps with your agent using the listed Actions.
Collect current primary evidence, synthesize a concise market brief, and send only the reviewed version.
Check public company and role evidence before drafting a relevant email, while keeping sending behind approval.
Combine current web sources with recent public conversation to distinguish durable changes from short-lived attention.
Demand and workflow source How to Audit AI Search Citations Across Kimi, Doubao, and DeepSeek